SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (39951)6/19/2001 4:42:12 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
<Bart,TT, Nemer, Judy, lisa, Kevin, OJ would come back to SI, play nice and share their thoughts on trading, but life just doesn't work that way. People grow and change. I think OJ has grown and changed alot in 5 years too. >

For me life works in a way where original intent has to be respected.

It would be very very instructive if you go back and read why such things as lack of understanding of futures and cash should have led to denunciations that had no relevance? Why lack of understanding of the value of future contracts should have led to frontal attacks?

Why this thread should become a 'carte blanche' for anyone to come and launch a frontal assault when Ike makes a mistake. When was the last time you thought it is necessary to come and say 'enough is enough' let leave this fool alone and go back to work without attacking Ike.

Why I am always considered a fool to be long when on 17th of April when market tested 11320 I called within minutes before that test happened that we are heading lower? And why these very same guys are not treated with same stick when between 24th of March to 5th of April we had a 43% move on Comp and these very same guys were spreading rumors based on 'voodoo' techniques that sell SOX at 438 or short the SPX at 1080. You should have been kind enough for once to come and say enough is enough Ike is a loser, lets leave him alone and move on, even if I call my bottom right or buy GE JPM my BRCM remains a problem. Every time I have been taken to task it has been for a reason that why the ..ck I made a wrong call?

Who else ever has been subject to such criticism? 40$ is not about stagnation or moving on man, it is about the very intent that confuses me, if one needs 40$ to make his or her views known I don't want to touch him, if the whole intent is to make money from the people and not from the market and that too miserly few thousand $'s from a 1000 people. I need to make sure that these guys should not come on my little corner and make that irresponsible statement to sell all rallies when they were not to be seen when market headed 'north' from dumps.

I am persecuted for my economic positive views (first case of economic cleansing by the shorts..ggg) like most of SI is comfortable with worst of radicals and shorts that have stubbornly remained stuck in sand over number of years with their views I demand just my breathing space to continue as a man with positive outlook.

OJ brings notoriety to this foolish wrong thread, which exposes me to attacks that I do not deserve from people who are unworthy. I just don’t want that with my busy life I want to come here do my job of letting those who care know what I think I know but to make this rich experience that is pregnant with hope and mutual understanding contaminated with ‘move on self enrichment’ streak is unfair and that what I have stamped now.

I think if greed, consumption and ‘this is my business’ and ‘moving on in life’ are defined by few paltry $’s. I can understand why family values and basic values are declining. I have made known my views on these very banal efforts to charge money as unworthy not one time but many a time and I am still being 'abused mentally' in my own house and by a man who I thought shared pain with me. If this is your value that is not how I live my life and that is not how I try to share. For me and probably for all novices like us either we do it with all sincerity or shut up, the case here is proprietary and integrity on both count you are little mixed.

I wished one of these days on silly things like 'Ike has not listened to me and my call' and with that excuse a ritual of 'tormenting and moaning with little cribbing' starts you may have unequivocally expressed your great views and said leave this eccentric bloke on his own. The very reason that some try to commercialize half baked knowledge is a very dishonest approach, a guy who has no 'Idea of stagflation mixes his TA with half cooked knowledge, the shorts and Ike bashers clap all around great call without realizing that when they post my 29th March 2001 post to condemn me we have moved up 43%.

I am neither caught up with self righteous streak nor a prisoner of my own surroundings but let me tell you OJ has rights and I respect them but he has no right to come and continue to make these 180 degree turn calls every 5 minute with invitations to charge here on this thread, you want to defend his right unfortunately without giving me a chance that inspite of my repeated requests he did not fail to stop his commercials here.

I will defend myself with best of my effort to defend my own house, that what it is all about rest is immaterial. We all move on and under this pretext abuse our responsibilities, and we all move on to dispatch our parents to die in 'old houses' as we grow up without realizing that those very frail hands fed us when we came crying in this world, this is not the kind of moving on I have learnt, I came crying in this world and I wish to die with people who would not ditch me or let me leave crying too, a departure with smile on face with people who share and care is may be little too much for your sensitivities but that is the spirit that propels me to write every single day share and develop, since last 5 years come rain come storm come 5000 point drop it was that sharing thing that keeps me going, 'moving on' for me is manifestation of animalistic self centered tendencies.. moving on like Mother Tressa or doing soething for someone is what I call moving on. Medicine san frontiers is moving on and charity is moving on.

I wish to make these uncommon values common with five people who listen to me! Is that a problem?

I agree 'these are part of moving on' where 'moving on means sometime selfishness and greed,' and utter lack of giving without remorse.

Thousands of people read this thread, many of them share great paid advisory services but look back how many of them wish to share, not much, I respect their reservations but people like me those who share have certain parameters that I would like those to be respected.

Where ‘moving on’ means forgetting our responsibility is moving back for me. I have stayed behind some have disappeared or ‘moved on’ I respect their views but I stayed because I promised it was never a 'bang bang and bi bi' station for me.



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (39951)6/19/2001 9:54:35 AM
From: Dr.MensaWannabe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
You know it would be great if some of the fantastic traders like Bart,TT, Nemer, Judy, lisa, Kevin, OJ would come back to SI, play nice and share their thoughts on trading, but life just doesn't work that way

I can only speak as to one name mentioned. Lisa can't come back. Scott Lux and SI Jeff have stated that the policy is not to reinstate old aliases. I find this excuse a bit odd, but there you have it.

Impristine has admitted to having 10 aliases. A brief search would indicate this is true.
siliconinvestor.com

I guess Lisa should make a Lisa2 alias and see if she is allowed to post. In the meantime, she just hangs her hat at the website du jour of Teresa Lo as she has for years.

I overheard that a bright young man once spoke about divided loyalties....with that I would concur.