SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (17102)6/19/2001 9:38:52 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"I would not kill a child. I have said repeatedly that I would not."

Wonderful so you are now against abortion? (The painful killing of an innocent human being) Or are they just outside of your definition of a human being? Like Blacks and Women and Jews have been at various times. Using dehumanizing language does not change the essential humanity of the unborn any more than it did for the Jews of Nazi Germany. So you would not kill a child. why not? Since you have already demonstrated your disgust for the lives of the yet to be born, handicapped, and can't even imagine that they could have or even bring joy into this world. why not do them a big favor and put them out of their obvious misery. What's so special about birth? Perhaps we should allow for a trial period where the mother can decide if she wants to keep the baby, or "Send it back".

Three posts and counting but still no answer to the question of aborting the not so severely handicapped, such as those with Down's Syndrome. You should go into politics.

<You happen to be in favor of the painful and unwarranted killing of innocent human beings>

Sigh all you like. That is abortion, and you are for it. Try that shoe on, and it will be you who will turn into a Princess.