SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Global Crossing - GX (formerly GBLX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Theophile who wrote (12022)6/19/2001 2:24:55 PM
From: TechMkt  Respond to of 15615
 
We're over 20 million shares today.

Martin - Are those all yours!?!?!?!? (missed you at the meeting last week).

Fez



To: Theophile who wrote (12022)6/19/2001 2:25:11 PM
From: 249443  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15615
 
"If Only Ravi Had Been More Bearish"

by James Cramer

6/19/01 9:25 AM ET
URL: thestreet.com

"Ravi Suria was a raving bull after all. He was way too positive about telecom. His projections for growth were much more rosy than they should have been. He was just another cockeyed optimist. If you don't remember Ravi, he's that fellow who did convertible bond research for Lehman Brothers before he moved over to Duquesne Capital. I always loved the guy because he called it as he saw it, and because he stood out as a lonely bear in what was then the very tail end of the bull market in telecommunications.

I used to speak to Ravi quite a bit, one of the privileges of being a Lehman Brothers client, and Ravi would read my stuff, where I would be bearish about telecommunications companies like Covad (COVD:Nasdaq) and Northpoint (NPNT:Nasdaq) and Rhythms (RTHM:Nasdaq), and he would send me messages about how I was way too bullish, because the problems of the industry would extend far past those poorly capitalized phone-line installers.

Over the course of many months, Ravi told me that we would see the destruction of Winstar, Teligent(TGNT:Nasdaq), 360networks(TSIX:Nasdaq), XO Communications(XOXO:Nasdaq) and Level Three(LVLT:Nasdaq). He said the wipeout we were facing would dwarf the S&L crisis and would be the main reason why the Fed would have to ease time and again, and it still might not matter.

And the whole time he was too bullish. I know it seems amazing, but he was. You see, Ravi was a bull on the industry; he really thought it would still grow at 20% and that it would exceed lots of peoples' estimates for traffic and use. He just felt that many of the players didn't have the capital to finish their buildouts. It turns out that not only was Ravi right about all of the companies not making it, but he was too optimistic about the industry as a whole. We are not seeing those growth rates pan out. The stunning admission from Nortel (NT:NYSE) that it believes Net traffic declined this past quarter (a function of the slamming of Napster, as well as the slowdown in shopping and stock trading) wasn't something that Ravi foresaw. Ravi wasn't bearish enough on McLeod (MCLD:Nasdaq) and Global Crossing(GX:NYSE), either, both of which he hinted could make it. Recent setbacks make those companies less likely to survive than he thought.

The fact that Ravi was too bullish says several negative things about our market and much about the business of Wall Street research. First, as much as we want to keep calling a bottom in telco tech (I am sure that Oracle's (Nasdaq:Nasdaq) statements will cause this group to rally today, even though they shouldn't), this area is in a depression and depressions don't turn on a dime. If your mutual fund is dependent upon these stocks coming back, sell that fund. If you are still, after all that has been said, overweighted in these stocks yourself, take something off, salvage something.

Now for the more damning of the topics: Ravi was one of a handful of people in the last year who actually saw this decline coming. Most did not. I genuinely believe, apropos of the Congressional Hearings on Research last week, that the analysts who didn't see it coming weren't corrupt, they just weren't as good as Ravi. They didn't do the high-quality work that Ravi did. And their perspective was dead wrong.

Ravi looked at the stocks from a balance-sheet perspective, the others looked at stocks from the top-down growth perspective. If the Internet were doubling every 72 hours or whatever poppycock was being spewed at the time, maybe more of these companies could have made it, but the simple truth is that there was not enough business to go around, to pay back all of the debt that was owed, and Ravi's specialty was analyzing the repayment of debt. In fact, there was less business than Ravi thought.

I can recall arguing with Ravi when he first started talking to me. I said that it was inconceivable that every telco that was started since 1996 would go belly-up. He asked me if I thought it was inconceivable that nearly every savings and loan would go belly-up in 1987. I said I did, but that a few years later there were almost none left. He said that the balance sheets of the S&Ls then were better than the balance sheets of the telecom equipment makers now. What a great call.

If only he had been more negative. But then again, had he been more negative, I think he would have had to bullet-proof his windows and hire a couple of burly bodyguards to get around town. Paul Sagawa at Sanford Bernstein deserves praise for getting it right. Many of Ravi's fellow analysts at Lehman were also signaling that things were much worse than they seemed. But as we survey the landscape of stocks that are vanishing and bonds that are trading at a few cents on the dollar, let's remember that Ravi Suria gave everybody a chance to get out when there was still something left of so many companies. He's the real hero of this market."



To: Theophile who wrote (12022)6/19/2001 2:25:28 PM
From: jopawa  Respond to of 15615
 
Qwest expands amid concerns of fiber glut
411
06/18/01 03:50 PM
Source: News.com
URL: investor.cnet.com

[1PARA OPEN] Qwest Communications International expanded its global network Monday even as concern spreads that massive construction in recent years has led to a glut of fiber-optic capacity.

By adding 7,000 miles of fiber-optic lines in Asia and the Middle East, Qwest has increased its network to total more than 113,000 miles worldwide.

The expansion--15 months in the making--allows Qwest to offer broader global networking options for its business customers. Qwest executives believe customers will continue to want bandwidth for data services and high-speed Internet connections.

"We expect this demand to continue to grow throughout 2001 and beyond," Qwest Chief Executive Joe Nacchio said in a statement.

But a host of massive and costly construction projects, begun in the mid-1990s by Qwest and competitors such as Level 3 Communications, Global Crossing and 360networks, has raised fears that there is more optical fiber than will be used.

Only a fraction of the capacity of these networks is being used today. As a result, some Wall Street analysts and investors fear that too much supply for the demand could make it difficult for these new carriers to recoup the billions of dollars they've spent to build these gleaming global networks.

"There's certainly an issue with many similar carriers attacking the same market," said Imran Kahn, senior broadband analyst at market research firm The Yankee Group. "There's certainly an overcapacity of providers building fiber-optic networks. That's one of the reasons why we see all these people come in and then have operational issues."

Other analysts say it could be many years before these new networks are brimming with data traffic, but that will eventually occur.

"With utilization rates as low as they are now, it will take a long time before even current capacity is filled, much less the doubling of the capacity planned for the next five years," said Zia Daniell Wigder, communications industry research director for Jupiter Research. "However, as broadband penetration increases, and as both more broadband content becomes available and users become more active users of broadband content, that will start to drive demand."

Evidence of overzealous network construction is hard to miss in the communications sector these days. Some companies have filed for bankruptcy, and most carriers have reduced their spending, which has resulted in poor sales for equipment makers such as Cisco Systems, Nortel Networks and Lucent Technologies, as well as for the component parts manufacturers that supply them.

For example, Level 3 announced substantial layoffs, reduced spending and revised financial projections Monday. Stock in the company plunged.

In the past week, 360networks failed to make an interest payment on its corporate debt, and Nortel and JDS Uniphase, a major optical component maker, issued new profit warnings.

Wall Street investment banking analysts hinted at the overcapacity in research reports Monday.

"Capacity utilization still remains low in portions of the networks such as long-distance terrestrial and the submarine market," Merrill Lynch wrote in a report addressing the implications of Nortel's warning on the European communications equipment market. "Internet traffic in (the first quarter) declined for the first time, which also does not bode well for network upgrades in the short term."

In a similar report downgrading its recommendation on Level 3 stock to "neutral" from "buy," Goldman Sachs said "lack of dark fiber demand" is partly to blame for the company's malaise.

And according to May estimates from Merrill Lynch, transatlantic capacity pricing declined by about 30 percent in the past six months, providing another sign that the communications industry may be overbuilt.

"It's pretty clear from pricing that there's some overcapacity in the backbone networks," said Hilary Mine, executive vice president at Probe Research, a communications and Internet industry research and consulting firm. "Backbone and transport costs have been coming down a bit and those are indications that there's some oversupply."

Bill Felix, senior vice president of worldwide network planning and engineering at Qwest, describes the question of whether there is a bandwidth glut as "the great debate in the industry."

But Felix said there is not an overcapacity because the majority of fiber-optic strands have not been activated, or lit, yet. Activating so-called dark fiber by turning on a variety of expensive equipment is more costly than installing the hair-like strands underground and is done only once the demand calls for it, he said.

For example, in most cases Qwest has activated only between eight and 12 of an available 48 strands on its network.

"Yes, there is quite a bit of fiber in the ground, but not much of it has been lit," Felix said.

Regardless of the current situation, some analysts believe that advanced applications and content and increased Internet use will fill these vast networks with traffic.

"Within 15 years we won't be in a glut situation," Mine said. "The question is whether it lasts 18 months or two years or five years. It's hard to imagine it lasting five years...But telecom has always been a long-term investor play."

More from CNET Investor: Market Update | My Portfolio | Brokerage Center | IPO Center | Splits | Message Boards