Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Sharck Soup -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DebtBomb who wrote (28683)	6/19/2001 4:33:09 PM
From: stomper	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37746

Dell Is Buying Back Some Stock At Almost Twice the Market Price By GARY MCWILLIAMS Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL As a result of an employee-compensation plan gone awry, Dell Computer Corp. is shelling out $47 a share to repurchase some of its own stock, even though the stock is currently trading at around $24. In fact, during the past four quarters, the Austin, Texas, personal-computer maker has paid a premium of about $750 million above its stock price to repurchase shares from financial institutions, according to its most recent financial statement. The now-costly commitments to buy its shares were made by Dell as part of a strategy to minimize the cost of granting stock options to employees. Under the strategy, Dell sold puts, or contracts to buy its shares at specified prices, receiving about 75 cents for each put. Over the years, Dell used the proceeds to offset the cost to issue shares. Until last fall, those puts expired, worthless, as Dell's stock price was above the price set to exercise the puts. Now, the slumping market for PC stocks is producing big losses on the repurchases at a time when Dell's vaunted cash generation has been squeezed by the PC slump and its own pursuit of a price war. For the past three quarters, the average closing price for the company's stock has been as much as $22 a share below the put exercise price. For the fiscal first quarter ended May 4, Dell spent $751 million on stock repurchases, or 91% of its cash flow from operations. Dell isn't the only company buying back such puts. Microsoft Corp. has been making similar premium-priced purchases. But analysts say the huge liability of retiring Dell's puts could affect its ability to make acquisitions and comes as its cash-flow engines are downshifting. "If it wanted to do nondiluted acquisitions with cash, it has in some sense precluded that," says Charles R. Wolf, a Needham & Co. computer analyst. "It was a foolish mistake to sell puts in the first place. There is an element of hubris on the company's part to think it could grow the stock price forever." Dell executives have said recently they would consider "strategic" acquisitions, which Wall Street believes would help it diversify into higher-margin businesses, such as services. A Dell spokesman said the puts have been part of a stock-buyback plan under which Dell has so far repurchased 887 million shares at an average price of less than $9 apiece. "These puts have helped minimize the expense of the program overall," the spokesman said. He declined to make a finance official available for an interview but said Dell would be willing to dip into its cash reserves of $5.27 billion (as of May 4) to repurchase the shares. Meanwhile, the cash drain could continue for some time. According to its latest Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Dell has written put contracts on 96 million shares at an average exercise price of $44 a share, representing a liability -- in a depressed market -- of $4.22 billion. The contracts expire at various times up to May 2, 2003 and allow the company to exercise the options with cash or stock. But Dell doesn't plan to issue shares, which would dilute its earnings per share. In 4 p.m. Nasdaq Stock Market trading Monday, Dell fell 40 cents to $23.92, well off its 52-week high of $54.67, set July 18, 2000. Thomas I. Selling, an accounting professor at the American Graduate School of International Management, Glendale, Ariz., called the link to stock compensation irrelevant. "It really is speculation, no matter what they say," he says. "It's arbitrary to match this put program with the stock-compensation program."

To: DebtBomb who wrote (28683)	6/19/2001 4:41:17 PM
From: TWICK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37746

We may not see that "next" for years to come. I can see Nano-technology being the next "next", but that is at least 5 to 10 years away from turning any kind of profitable products for the mass markets. Until then, it's most likely the bio techs, and whatever has a beating heart once the Grim Reeper is done with the Tech sector. Twick

To: DebtBomb who wrote (28683)	6/19/2001 6:19:40 PM
From: thestockrider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37746

What's next to propel semi demand? Star Wars, the solid state version. Joint Chiefs of Staff reviewing data from hundreds of solid state spy satellites over enemy territory. Missile commanders ordering down nuke strikes, neutron strikes, laser strikes from multi-display workstations running the latest Pentium-V chips. Field commanders getting realtime weather and enemy position updates from satellites while they sit in bunkers under washington dc sipping cappucino. Realtime battle field tick information delivered over broadband fiber optics to every sargeant, artilleryman, and grunt. Redundant, overbuilt hubs at every army base in the country enabling command and control from everywhere. Tanks remotely controlled by Visors with wireless modems.