SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (137629)6/19/2001 5:55:38 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
GV, <Once you start attributing human qualities to analysts rather than subhuman (or superhuman, depending on what's being interpreted), they're a lot easier to understand.>

I don't understand how this applies to Joe Osha. If his recent miscalls are only human, then why is he being paid more than your average human? Why is he in a position that has more influence than most humans ever dream of having?

Maybe a more appropriate comparison would be to Hollywood.

Tenchusatsu



To: GVTucker who wrote (137629)6/19/2001 6:21:10 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV,

I guess that in a better world there would be a presumption that as an analyst, they are unbiased, and that their recommendations are based solely on open minded analysis of information.

And what is their real value, to their customers, if there is any hint of prejudice? I would rather have no opinion at all, than one I thought could be colored by personal ambition or other motivations.

John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News