SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rich4eagle who wrote (154351)6/19/2001 10:48:43 PM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
I think the real test is how the economy does in the years following a Dem or Rep Administration. The economy does not turn on a dime.

The Clinton hangover continues...

~SB~



To: rich4eagle who wrote (154351)6/20/2001 3:36:30 PM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
What, like the Carter administration? Like the LBJ administration, which oversaw the creation of a welfare underclass?

The Republicans lost the Senate because of a double dealing Senator who has always been more Democrat than Republican in any case. It sure isn't the overwhelming loss that Clinton experienced when he lost the WHOLE HOUSE majority to Newt's Republican sweep. Ooops.

Shooting bullets with bullets already has proof of concept - the Patriot. Been there, done that. Putin says a lot, but what gets said behind closed doors is what is important, not what is said for public consumption. FACT of the matter is, no missile shield would be effective against a major nuclear power like Russia - too many missiles. The missile shield is no threat to Russia, and they can't afford a new arms race, and don't think all parties involved don't know it. China objects because they are afraid of a theater missile defense which would cover Taiwan, and neutralize their cross-strait missile forces they have been building up for so long.

I am not surprised you haven't "heard" a thought from me yet, richie, as you wouldn't recognize a thought if one managed to creap into your tiny brain from the maze of wax that is your ears or the pudding that lies in your eyesockets.

Derek



To: rich4eagle who wrote (154351)6/20/2001 3:43:01 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
and are on a mission to lose the House

Ooops! We gained a seat yesterday in a special election. Poor richie the dunce can't ever seem to get it right. JLA

From the FoxNews website:

Republican Wins Va. House Election


AP

Randy Forbes

Wednesday, June 20, 2001

Former Virginia GOP chairman Randy Forbes was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in a special election Tuesday, defeating a fellow state senator who had hoped to become Virginia's first black female in Congress.

The previous seat-holder, Democrat Norm Sisisky, died in March after representing the 4th district of Virginia for nearly 20 years.

"Hopefully this is a good win for the Republican Party, and it will help make sure that the president's agenda gets a fair shake," Forbes said after receiving a congratulatory telephone call from the president Tuesday night.

Forbes, who captured 52 percent of the vote to 48 percent for his opponent, Democrat Louise Lucas, told President Bush, "We couldn't have done it without you."

The president is eager to portray Forbes' victory, which gives Republicans 222 seats in the House to the Democrats' 210, as an embrace of his vision for America.

Forbes will be celebrating with a visit to the White House Wednesday.

The lawyer from Chesapeake, Va., was pressured by the White House to make a run in this district that party leaders on both sides suggested might be a bellwether for next year's congressional elections.


AP
Randy Forbes, and Democrat Louise Lucas
The race was at times bitter in tone and tactics.

Both Forbes and his Democratic rival were popular state senators. But Lucas' major selling point was a campaign to protect Social Security from privatization efforts that didn't seem to energize voters as much as the Democrats had hoped.

"It looks like we fell a little short," the former shipfitter told volunteers in a concession speech. "But each of us knows that we gave it everything we had."

Thirty-eight percent of the district's registered voters participated in the election.

Each side also accused the other of injecting race into the campaign for a district that is 39 percent black. Forbes' campaign criticized a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee mailing that pictured a black child on the cover and declared "12 million of us will be left behind" by Bush's budget.

A few days later, a Forbes supporter was quoted as telling a white reporter that Lucas was "working to get the people out to vote. Her people. Not Randy's people, not my people, not your people, but her people." Lucas' campaign chastised Forbes for not disavowing the remark.

Lucas had received help on the campaign trail from several House Democrats. She and her surrogates visited 74 black churches Sunday in a final get-out-the-vote effort.

Bush and his mother, former first lady Barbara Bush, both recorded telephone campaign messages for Forbes. Vice President Dick Cheney was one of several high-profile Republicans who came to the district to campaign for Forbes.

Forbes' win also was a boost for Republican National Committee chairman Jim Gilmore, the Virginia governor, who could not afford to lose in his own backyard.

"This success in a moderate district shows the president's vision for America is appealing to voters across the political spectrum — proof positive that the GOP is expanding the reach of our party," Gilmore said.

Virginia Rep. Tom Davis, chairman of the Republican National Congressional Committee, said Forbes' victory shows that Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords' defection, which cost the GOP control of the Senate, was a fluke.

"This speaks volumes as to where the country wants to go, as opposed to the idiosyncrasies of one senator," Davis said.

But New York Rep. Nita Lowey, who chairs the Democratic National Congressional Committee, said the special election didn't have any national implications.

"It was a local race and it will only impact local voters," she said. "There was no national theme to this race, and neither side spent a dime talking about President Bush."

The national parties spent an estimated $3.5 million on behalf of the candidates, mostly for TV advertising.

Fox News' David Shuster and the Associated Press contributed to this report.