Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (137711)	6/20/2001 10:10:40 AM
From: Bob Kim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

GV, In bold from ML's P&P manual: "Communications which could be interpreted as disparaging to the character or integrity of a company's management, or offensive to public sensibilities, are prohibited."

To: GVTucker who wrote (137711)	6/20/2001 10:29:28 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

GV, re: "It might not be a smart practice, but it certainly is legal." If I were to publish that Tucker Capitol Management was using inappropriate accounting to misstate and improve it's performance, would that be libelous? Would you feel you had the right to legally challenge my statement? Libel - "A defamatory statement or representation esp. in the form of written or printed words; specif A false published statement that injures an individual's reputation (as in business) or otherwise exposes him or her to public contempt." Andy Bryant has stated that Intel is not stuffing the channel, but is filling orders as they are received. Osha implies that Intel is stuffing the channel to make it's numbers. re: "The primary mission of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets." - I don't see anything in Osha's comments that would be relevant. I do. John