Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (17198)	6/20/2001 4:15:29 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Well, at least you're consistent. Tough, but consistent. I assume your answer is the same if the woman tricks the guy, says she's on the pill but is lying, wants a baby but wants to make sure it's with a guy who can afford to pay her lots of child support. So she lies to him. So he's on the hook for 18 years of support for a one night fling with a woman who lied to him. You still say he should pay, right? How about if she rapes him? Should he still be on the hook for the resulting child?