Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Appliance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (8475)	6/20/2001 8:56:47 PM
From: kas1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10934

I propose a partial explanation for recent high-volume selloff in NTAP and Naz: End of funds' 3Q, window-dressing. Anyone agree?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (8475)	6/20/2001 8:59:53 PM
From: CrayUSA	Respond to of 10934

NTAP---bingo,, your 2 points are accurate...and NTAP is no LU. They don't have the liquidity problems or the same business....and since you mentioned LU,, it is probably a good buy too,, although much more risky and will take longer to recover. Rallies are rallies,, bottoms are bottoms. They are not predictable. My guess is that 1650 was bottom or near bottom. I don't care though. Remember the market always has set new highs and re-traced. Just part of the natural cycle. The way to make real money is to buy them when they are way down....and wait. The good way to make good money although not huge is to cost average in a good fund or index. Cray