SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Aahh...iNEXTV (AXC) The NEXT Thing! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin O'Donnell who wrote (3991)6/20/2001 9:32:56 PM
From: Hal Campbell  Respond to of 4169
 
<< Does Doctrine of Equivalents Ring a Bell?>>

AIYIYI it sure does, Kevin. I attended the appellate court hearing..the crowd was jammed with Mitsubishi employees...Judge Michel was hostile from the get go...the only thing lacking from the drama was the Supremes singing
Estoppel in The Name Of Love . <G>

After the decision I realized I know nothing of the law, because it made little or no sense to me.



To: Kevin O'Donnell who wrote (3991)6/20/2001 9:36:43 PM
From: DrD  Respond to of 4169
 
Kevin, Indeed it does ring a bell. I was much chagrined by the judge's reversal or overruling action. Although it is probably too late for Ampex to benefit, I hope the Supreme Court will bring some sanity to this area of litigation. FWIW, I still think we wuz robbed!!!
DrD


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News