Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: N. Dixon who wrote (7964)	6/20/2001 10:23:40 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10293

We can debate what's a fact and what isn't later. It seems we'll have plenty of time for that. In the meantime, that makes three times you have now refused to explicity state the terms under which you would concede defeat in your proposed wager. What percentage is there in accepting a bet which you will never have to admit when we've won? Yeah, yeah, I know, "just as Robert Saxe stated", but I want you to put it in your own, unambiguous words that specifically apply to the wager. It's amazing how other people's words get "reinterpreted" as time goes by. ("Congress shall pass no Law" comes to mind), and the last thing I want to hear in 18 months is "well when he said.... he really MEANT.... ". No, no sale on that BS. Your words, your terms, no ambiguity, or forget it. You're the one proposing the bet, I don't think this is an unreasonable request. Speaking for myself and no one else.