SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BinkY2K who wrote (7969)6/20/2001 11:17:02 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
The company denies that price makes any sense. Numbers like $15 or $17 per square foot are more likely.

He said, they said. We won't know until they actually make a sale, now will we?

You can verify my numbers as being more current and reflect more on how marketable the technology is.

I find 35 years of no sales reflects more on how marketable the technology is than any price quote.



To: BinkY2K who wrote (7969)6/24/2002 10:58:17 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
One more and I'll try to leave it in peace:

Kevin, The price of $100 per square foot is absolutely bogus. ... The company denies that price makes any sense. Numbers like $15 or $17 per square foot are more likely. ... Hankuk has announced making film and their stated price for glass with film already on it is $400 per square meter or $37 per square foot."

So sayeth the Binkster.

But now here's reality and a price list for skylights, one of the most elementary possible applications:

spd-systems.com

24" x 36" = $1390
24" x 48" = $1840
24" x 60" = $2290

A little arithmetic reveals that the price of all three sizes of skylight window is a nearly constant $230 per square foot. The fact that the price per area is nearly constant implies that the overhead is either almost nil, or an inseparable part of the consumer cost of SPD.

$230 per square foot. What happened to Hankuk's $37, Bink? If anything it now seems Lawrence and Asensio were TOO LOW with their $100 estimate for production costs.

And they wonder why REFR gets no respect from the real money.