SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (137851)6/21/2001 9:06:29 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
The specs have now been released and there is almost no difference in power consumption between .18 coppermine and .13 tualatin.

That Intel has nothing better to produce with the early limited number of .13 wafer starts than PIIIs, including some as slow as 866MHZ, is striking. Either their new product lines are in complete disarray or their .13 transition is a failure. AMD's emergency effort to add SOI to their .13 process seemed to indicate that .13 on conventional wafers provides little or no benefit in terms of speed or power consumption. Intel's recent actions may be a confirmation. AMD lowered power consumption more from a re-layout of Athlon on an existing .18 CU process than Intel gained from a a re-layout and a move from .18 AL to .13 CU.