Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (137855)	6/21/2001 2:00:21 PM
From: tcmay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Descriptive subject line goes here << Message #137855 from Amy J at Jun 21, 2001 3:25 AM Hi Tim, Call options (cont) RE: "I'll comment on it in a few hours or a day or so." Are you going to add comments to this (the topic was call options). Am interested in reading it. >> Maybe. <<RE: "Understood. But I believe comments here in this forum are for anyone to respond to" RE could stand for anything: reply, responding, regarding, or even regarding another topic. My only point was that sometimes I miss the smaller ". >> But since nearly every post to SI is a reply to another article, rather than a "new subject," a "RE:" is redundant and takes up space in the subject line that could be devoted to a _descriptive_ subject. Anyway, since SI seemingly lacks good quoting tools (like showing included quotes with a ">" or similar symbol), we all have to roll our own. I have been using the "<< stuff >> " approach recently. Also, if you're thinking you may miss articles in response to your own, check your INBOX. Should be posts following up _your_ posts in your INBOX, so you can't miss them. --TIm May