Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (17291)	6/22/2001 8:16:38 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Making infanticide illegal would make all those women criminals. Killing of first born infants by religious mental midgets was a primitive tribal rite. In Hebrew times it was male children. In Indian culture it was usually daughters. It was always religious and had nothing to do with the role of the mother. It has no relevance whatsoever to the question of stripping all mothers of their right to their body. It won't happen. You are a fool if you think woman would ever again allow themselves to be treated like the useless chattel of religious maniacs. Please give examples of what the hell you are talking about? I gave the scenario already. I'm sorry, but you did not receive a starring role in the new world order! Better luck next time! I'm still waiting for your answer about D.S fetus's. That is too bad. I didn't pay any attention whatsoever to your question. If you had any brains and manners you would have known the reason. If you wish to ask the question SINCERELY, like a gentleman--without broadcasting racist and misanthropic innuendo into the discussion--I will be only too pleased to give you my opinion. There is not any question in the world that I am afraid of answering honestly and forthrightly. I am not ashamed of any of my beliefs. But if you ask a question with a shitty mouth, you might not get an answer. If you want to ask a question about Down's Syndrome, I will consider it. The first thing for you to do is to retrieve the ORIGINAL post, IN ITS ENTIRETY--so that I and all others may review it. Next, you may ask the question over again--in a manner which is not crass, ill-bred, and ignorant. If I then consider that you have asked a question with sincerity and maturity, then I will answer it. If you are still tossing around ugly innuendo and racist imputations, then your question will be ignored. Remember, as well, that God does not care much for the handicapped... (of course, what it really means is that this TRIBE didn't care much for the handicapped) LEVITICUS 21:16 Speak unto Aaron, saying, Whosoever he be of thy seed in their generations that hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. 21:18 For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, 21:19 Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, 21:20 Or crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken;