Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Lundin Oil (LOILY, LOILB Sweden) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tomas who wrote (2562)	6/23/2001 1:39:19 PM
From: Tomas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2742

OT: Petro-Canada hungry for state stake Upstream, June 22 Dann Rogers Petro-Canada's boss has asked the federal government to sell half of its remaining 18.5% stake in the firm back to the Calgary-based integrated company. The federal government created Petro-Canada in 1975 as a "window on the industry" but has been cutting its stake incrementally over the last decade. Petro-Canada's chief executive Ron Brenneman said the company is sitting with a cash reserve of about C$2 billion ($1.3 billion), roughly equivalent to the value of the government's 49 million shares of the firm. "If they decide to put their interest on the block, because of the cash position we have, we would be interested in taking perhaps up to half of it," he said at an investment conference in Calgary this week. Last week the federal government passed legislation that alters the ownership limits on the former Crown corporation. The new law eliminates restrictions that prevented non-Canadians from holding a total of more than 25% of the company. The legislation also doubles individual ownership limits to 20%. Industry analysts have speculated these moves would let Ottawa follow through on its promise to sell the remaining Petro-Canada shares while maximising return for shareholders. They say now is a good time to sell given high commodity prices as well as strong refining margins.

To: Tomas who wrote (2562)	6/23/2001 8:36:53 PM
From: Tomas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2742

Libya: PetroCan hopes to avoid U.S. wrath 'We don't foresee' U.S. investigation over Libyan deal Financial Post, June 22 Peter Morton WASHINGTON - Petro-Canada is hoping to fly below U.S. political radar in a US$75-million deal that would see it help develop oil and natural gas in Libya, one of several terrorist-supporting countries the U.S. has imposed sanctions. The Calgary-based integrated oil company, which is still 18% owned by the federal government, said yesterday it was buying a 25% interest in the En Naga block in the Sirte basin in Libya from the Swedish oil company Lundin AB. The other 75% share is held by Libya's National Oil Co. The U.S. Congress is poised to extend by five years its Iran-Libya Sanctions Act, which can impose penalties on foreign companies operating in either country that have investments worth more than US$20-million. George W. Bush, the U.S. President, also indicated he would be prepared to support an extension of the sanctions law when it expires in August. But Petro-Canada is betting that its minor stake in the oilfield in Libya would be so small that it would not attract a U.S. State Department investigation. "In the grand scheme of things, this is a relatively minor purchase," said Chris Dawson, a spokesman for Petro-Canada, adding the company talked with "appropriate government officials" before making the investment. "We don't foresee any investigation by the State Department." The sanctions act allows the president to impose several types of penalties on foreign companies that have U.S. interests, including prohibiting loans from U.S. banks over US$10-million, denial of U.S. government contracts and even a ban on imports to the United States from a foreign company found violating the act. Since the act was signed by Bill Clinton in 1996, the government has not imposed any sanctions. The State Department did launch an investigation in April, 1999, into an investment by Bow Valley Energy Ltd. of Calgary and its French partner, Elf Aquitaine SA. The two are part of a US$300-million offshore project in Iran. But little came of the investigation and Bow Valley is still operating in the Balai field. "The act has never been enforced," said Eric Thomas, a spokesman for USAEngage, a coalition of 670 U.S. companies pushing Congress to end the sanctions against Iran and Libya, especially now that Iranian government is seen as more moderate and the Libyian government has handed over suspects in the Pan-Am 103 bombing over Scotland in 1988. "The State Department would like the act to go away," said Mr. Thomas. The Iran-Libya sanctions are much milder, however, than those imposed by the Helms-Burton law on foreign companies operating in Cuba. Unlike Helms-Burton, the Iran-Libya law does not bar executives from companies hit with sanctions from entering the United States. pmorton@nationalpost.com nationalpost.com