Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (5218)	6/23/2001 7:00:44 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 74559

<I assume you looked at the NASA animation I linked last week. If you did, you could see with your own eyes that very little CO2 is being emitted by the US - > Oh yea??? How much?? ROFLMAO... DAK

To: Ilaine who wrote (5218)	6/23/2001 7:27:29 PM
From: pezz	Respond to of 74559

<<China, however, emits quite a bit,>> China has extensive coal deposits and they plan to bring one billion Chinese into the 21st century with it. As the Gipper would say "You ain't seen nothin yet"

To: Ilaine who wrote (5218)	6/23/2001 9:20:40 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 74559

Hi CB, <<I assume you looked at the NASA animation I linked last week ... We've cleaned up our industry quite a bit - it's someone else's turn>> I did, with my own eyes, and realize unselfishly (I got to breathe the same air as everyone else, most of the time) that the path to China's development is not going to be that different than the US': growing food, cooking food, leave some spare time to make some semiconductors, write some programs, and getting on with it. And so, therefore, no right, no wrong, just is, and so it must be, unless there is a fairer and more democratic way, which the Kyoto process was supposed to figure out. Chugs, Jay