SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Murder Mystery: Who Killed Yale Student Suzanne Jovin? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (955)7/15/2001 9:31:15 PM
From: CJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1397
 
<<Should someone who finds him or herself in such an unenviable situation .....>>

Hi Jeff -- You've posed an excellent question, to which there is not an absolute answer, as much depends on the particular circumstances. IMO, generally, with Jim Van de Veld and Condit situations, the very best is to come forward affirmatively and immediately, offering full and complete cooperation, and making it clear that all else is secondary to helping to find the murderer {Jovin} and helping to find the missing person {Levy}. As you know, while I feel Jim could have been a bit more forthcoming initially {eg. offering to take a polygraph test from the outset}, he was treated extremely unfair. As for Condit, again, IMO, he missed the perfect opportunities to put a positive "spin" on his sincerity and concern {despite being a "transgressor" which would have been minimized}. He should have been the first to call a Press Conf. --with a careful, truthful, shameful and concerned statement. As for his transgressions, those who confess {as it being contrary to one's customary behavior}, apologize, show remorse, and take clear steps to obtain help and be helpful, are quickly forgiven. Condit may have had a bit of a behavioral pattern to overcome :); but it was not insurmountable.

Jim's is quite a different story -- and he had nothing to confess.

Your "... it's damned if you do and damned if you don't when it appears you are being considered a suspect in a high-profile murder" is the very essence of the problem.

The clear objective should be to "go public" BEFORE you become a suspect!

Regards,
Carol