Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (11555)	6/24/2001 10:49:30 PM
From: puborectalis	Respond to of 12823

Xilinx, ASIC vendors talk licensing By Peter Clarke EE Times (06/22/01 17:42 p.m. EST) Recent Articles Communications IBM, National team up to accelerate Internet gateways in household systems Intersil enters 5-GHz WLAN chip market with IC based on IBM's SiGe and ARM's RISC core Tundra Semi cuts 15% of its workforce, $1.5 million from budget Startup Multilink Technology raises $72 million Communications-chip maker Multilink raises $72 million in IPO Qualcomm takes equity stake in Taiwan's HTC, licenses CDMA technology to startup Archives LAS VEGAS — Xilinx Inc. is talking to ASIC vendors about licensing its field-programmable gate array blocks to them. If such discussions are successful, ASIC companies will be able to include FPGAs in their ASICs and provide field programmability to their customers. Wim Roelandts, president and chief executive officer of Xilinx (San Jose, Calif.) — the company that invented the FPGA in the mid '80s — gave the clearest indication yet that the company would license its FPGAs to ASIC companies during the final-day keynote Thursday (June 21) at the 38th Design Automation Conference here. Roelandts talked about his company's discussions after his keynote, when Michael Riepe, a member of the consulting staff at Magma Design Automation Inc. (Cupertino, Calif.), asked Roelandts about the possibility of using Xilinx FPGA structures in ASICs. "For several years we have been talking with ASIC companies about providing them with FPGA cores," answered Roelandts. He later said, "We believe it's the right way for the industry to go." Speaking to EE Times after his speech, Roelandts said that "we have some discussions. We are certainly open to consider licensing." When he was asked whether any discussions were close to a conclusion, he replied, "I don't say it is imminent. One doesn't know whether these talks will go quickly or slowly." Given its history with Xilinx, IBM Microelectronics is an obvious candidate to take up Xilinx's FPGA architecture. IBM has already licensed its PowerPC processor core and the CoreConnect bus to Xilinx. The core and bus serve as the basis for Xilinx's Empower range of hybrid diffused cores and FPGA devices. In July 2000, when the IBM-Xilinx deal was announced, it did not include an IBM license of Xilinx technology. But John Kelly, general manager of IBM Microelectronics, did say at that time that he was willing to consider placing FPGA cores onto ASIC systems-on-chip. Although ASIC vendors have traditionally competed at the bottom end with FPGAs, the mixing of ASIC cores and FPGA fabric is part of a blurring of the distinction between ASICs and FPGAs that Roelandts spoke about during his keynote. Hailing the entrance of his company's FPGA products into the mainstream, Roelandts went on to offer arguments showing why FPGAs are useful in reducing time-to-market, reducing the cost of getting to market and maximizing the time products last in the market. An essential part of this, Roelandts said, is the ability to do in-service equipment upgrades over the Internet. "Sending hardware through the network; it might sound like science fiction, but it's really happening. Of course, we are just sending bit streams, but it expands a product's market because you can expand its utility afterward." Hybrids coming Roelandts said 30 to 40 percent of Xilinx customers now use this field upgradability in their products, compared with less than 5 percent three years ago. But Roelandts spent most of his time focused on the platform-level hybrid devices that his company is introducing. He said that Virtex-II Pro would support diffused processors, sea-of-multiplier-type digital signal processors and system I/O structures at the same time. "For Virtex-II Pro we plan the integration of a transceiver at 3 and 8 Gbits/second. A transceiver does the serialization and deserialization and clock recovery. So it will take a 3-Gbit/s serial stream and convert it into 32 parallel channels, which the FPGA can easily cope with, and do the reverse on the way out." Roelandts said such transceivers would be the basis of the way Xilinx would support Infiniband, Gigabit Ethernet and Fibre Channel I/O directly on its Virtex devices. Roelandts added that the products would be "on the market in the next three to six months."

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (11555)	6/25/2001 12:02:45 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12823

Hi Ray, It is nice to see Tom Nolle expose his 'circuits are property - I love RBOCs' dis-position. >>I do tend to agree with Eric Krapf, that the new battlefield for the RBOCs is not with the CLECs but rather with the MSOs. However, in that arena, the cableco equipment vendors aren't producing DOCSIS 1.1 compliant gear, and the whole MSO VoIP effort seems stalled if not stillborn at this time.<< I think DOCSIS 1.1 gear is shipping 3Q01 from some vendors, and the pre 1.1 that is shipping has QOS priority for voice signalling, so VOIP is possible now. petere