Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dave rose who wrote (17351)	6/25/2001 7:14:15 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Do you agree that there is a huge difference between a group of cells (potentially a human) and a slave? To take your question literally, no. A slave IS a group of cells. Nothing more. So am I, so are you. You say "potentially a human." That, of course, begs the question. Is an embryo a human? It is a question that can't be answered scientifically, can't be answered by any form of logical proof. It's purely a matter of definition, and all definitions are arbitrary. Is an embryo capable of living outside it's mother's body more or less human than a 60 year old in a coma who is completely dependent on machines to live? Or, let's say, a person with failed kidneys who is completely dependent on dialysis to live and would die in days if her blood weren't dialyzed? The one is capable of life without aid of machines. The other is not. What IS a human?????

To: dave rose who wrote (17351)	6/25/2001 7:14:38 PM
From: average joe	Respond to of 82486

"Do you agree that there is a huge difference between a group of cells (potentially a human) and a slave? What a comparison. A slave is a group of cells and human and there is no difference, the potential starts at conception.