Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldsheet who wrote (72408)	6/26/2001 1:53:28 PM
From: Ken Benes	Respond to of 116805

That is a pretty good reason to avoid gold stocks unless you are a trader. Not a bright future for the sector, I see little investor interest in a long term growth scenario for a gold issue. Ken

To: goldsheet who wrote (72408)	6/26/2001 1:56:00 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116805

This one is it! No more fun runs.

To: goldsheet who wrote (72408)	6/26/2001 2:12:42 PM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116805

> What does a 10 million ounce producer do for the price of gold >> Absolutely nothing, consolidation is needed to affect the cost (not price of gold) Every other metal has 3 or 4 producers that control 50-75% of production.<< Hi Bob. Every other metal is not a threat to the US$ so I wonder if it is wise to have to have one company in control of so much gold production. And IMO so long as bush and mulruiney sit on the board of directors there will be some government influence in this company, I have been told on this thread in the past that they are like any of the other directors in this company. I just don't think so. Lorne