Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FastC6 who wrote (155904)	6/26/2001 4:09:32 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

SE, Execution let him off easy. Solitary confinement for 70 years would have been much more difficult. Scumbria

To: FastC6 who wrote (155904)	6/26/2001 4:25:12 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Respond to of 769670

Correct.....I think he should have gotten somekind of life sentence instead. Capital punishment is nothing more than a democratic lynching. The attempt at the rectification of evil with additional murder only adds more evil. It also serves to add additional evil while everyone waits in anticipation for the execution. Why not try to heal without wishing for more death?

To: FastC6 who wrote (155904)	6/26/2001 4:26:16 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Respond to of 769670

If she is against capital punishment as a matter of principle, she is of course compelled to think McVeigh should never have been put to death. It is a common twisted position amongst liberals that we should be free to murder innocent unborn children if we wish, but never be free to exact ultimate justice upon guilty mass murderers. The liberal would much rather feed and clothe the mass-murderer at public expense, and let the unborn children be slaughtered on whim. There is a great deal of evil to be plainly seen in the liberal position on abortion and capital punishment.