SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (138199)6/26/2001 5:09:11 PM
From: GVTucker  Respond to of 186894
 
2Q warnings aren't that big a deal, it seems. XLNX is only down a couple of points since resuming trading.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (138199)6/26/2001 6:44:29 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
And another replay:

Vitesse now sees third-qtr loss instead of profit
CAMARILLO, Calif., June 26 (Reuters) - Communications chipmaker Vitesse Semiconductor Corp. (NasdaqNM:VTSS - news) said on Tuesday that it will have an operating loss in the third quarter, rather than an expected profit, due to continuing weak demand and order cancellations.

The Camarillo, California-based company said it now sees a loss of 6 cents a share before one-time items on sales of about $60 million. The per-share estimate for a loss excludes the amortization of goodwill and deferred compensation as well as anticipated restructuring and other charges.

When the company reported fiscal second-quarter earnings on April 16, it had forecast third-quarter sales of $90 million to $110 million and pro forma earnings per share of 3 cents to 7 cents.

Analysts had forecast the company to earn 3 cents a share, with estimates ranging from a profit of 6 cents to a loss of 2 cents, according to research firm Thomson Financial/First Call. Sales were forecast at $93.7 million.

The company also said that its earlier job cuts were sufficient to bring the company's costs in line with desired levels and added that no more firings were required.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (138199)6/26/2001 6:54:27 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
I'm curious what people on the thread think of this:

kurzweilai.net

Fair warning: It's very off the wall, and a long read.

John