SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Jackson who wrote (14297)6/27/2001 10:53:42 AM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14627
 
I think the problem with Diablillos is simply a matter of cost per ounce. The "ore" has to be milled to get acceptable recovery and the deposit requires a lot of stripping if it were to produce as an open pit. Thus the odds are the cost per ounce is going to be in the top quartile (expensive) of producers due to probable higher capex than a heap leach operation and higher operating expenses due to crushing and milling. I think everyone is looking at this prospect as inventory right now. The Company claims there is a resource of about 2.1 million ozs of gold equivalent, consisting of 30 million tonnes that grades 3 oz silver and 0.60 g/tn gold. Hard to say what the in situ value is. US$1 per ounce?



To: Bill Jackson who wrote (14297)7/6/2001 3:04:19 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14627
 
Bill,

Diablillos is a project that will make sense to work on only when silver prices are much higher. It will likely need $6-7+ to be profitable. Although there are some very good intercepts, the problem is that silver grade/recovery rates are too low for heap leaching. For sure it could eventually be mined by conventional mining, but then CAPEX will be much higher...