Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CountofMoneyCristo who wrote (74)	6/27/2001 7:08:13 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3143

Well, I now certainly have no reason to trust you or her. Absolutely true...I have given you no more reason to trust me than you have given anyone to trust you. You say that your record is the reason to trust you. Have you every violated the trust of another SI member by divulging information given to you in trust? If you have, then you might want to get off of your high horse on trust. More importantly, neither Leeza nor I are asking people to give us personal information. You are asking people to send you personal information directly, you should be held to a higher standard of trust. I am neither a friend, nor a foe of this action. I don't have any skin in the game. I was a member of Market Gems for one month, found it to be totally useless and cancelled the service. If I had lost a lot of money because of one of those pay for play services, I would blame myself and I would not entertain suing. This does not mean that I think that those services are any less slimey (and the law may be on your side, but that is not meaningful to my views on the topic).... my record on SI will support that I am no friend of any pay for play trading enterprise that has used SI as a promotional venue. So, where you may see me as the enemy, I am certainly no friend to the other side.