Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NightOwl who wrote (75138)	6/29/2001 12:38:24 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

night, stinker is just throwing up a red herring. he knows what i mean and this thread isn't a courtroom. he's like the clinton cronies defending bill's definition of "is" just so folks won't talk aabout the reaal issues. in this case, that rmbs was convicted of civil fraud. he doesn't want to discuss this FACT. he'd rather fall into ad hominem exposing the weakness of his position. but, aalas, i see through it as do others. rmbs' actions were illegal and they will pay $350k and, imho, will lose their sdram patents and all royalties. they will have to restate earnings and return all prior sdram related royalties. that will rock this stock and it is sure, imho. the bigger question is whether any patents include BOTH the fraud sdram AND the rmbs. if so, can rmbs lose the rights to the WHOLE patent? is this a way thaat rmbs technology becomes PUBLIC DOMAIN? this is a question that all rmbs longs should ask, but are too scared.