Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chowder who wrote (91863)	6/29/2001 11:13:59 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Respond to of 95453

nicely done!! thanks for taking the time.... J

To: chowder who wrote (91863)	6/29/2001 11:13:59 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

nicely done!! thanks for taking the time.... J

To: chowder who wrote (91863)	6/29/2001 8:34:13 PM
From: Greg Jung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Thanks for the TA discussion/tutorial, and in turn I'll refer you to another stock with a GOOD looking chart (rare these days) - hlit. RE: NAT I would add that would-be buyers of NAT take the weekly chart to heart, maybe if you hit a local bottom you get +5, or 25% to 22 but it looks like a nasty and slippery slope to the lower teens you become a long-term stuckholder. FWIW The oil price increase has been predicated on a supply restriction so that the surplus shipping will serve to keep prices low. Compound that into a worldwide recessionary wave ...