Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (75171)	6/29/2001 2:42:14 PM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 93625

Truth, accuracy & objectivity are not on that agenda. On the other hand, that's all that's on the agenda for all the local flacks for a certain fraudulent company. What a joke.

To: Sully- who wrote (75171)	6/29/2001 3:38:16 PM
From: tinkershaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

please continue to post your POV on RMBS. It's a refreshing change from the constant load of blatant BS served up here by Team FUD. I'm sure I'll be back from time to time in-between the never ending loads of propoganda. Don't get me wrong, I am sure there are many people posting their honest opinions, Skeeter for instance I believe is expressing honestly held opinions. From reading Skeeter's posts one cannot help but sense quite a bit of personal bias in those opinions, but were all human, and Skeeter has some good points. I agree with some of what he says, or at least can understand the viewpoint. But sometimes it also helps to step-back and really check if your being objective or not. The post of Skeeters regarding Rambus criminal, Barrett, et al., really was not an objective post, although that may have been the intent, but clearly was a hit piece on Rambus. Whether intended or not, that is what it was. Bilow, aka Night Owl (or so some sources have told me but I have no personal knowledge of the aka), well, that is another story. But as long as you know where the information is coming from, take it for what it is worth. I'm sure someday Ali or Via might come to Bilow's rescue, if I were a princess though, wouldn't be the first knight I'd have on my mind in regard. But everyone has to have a hypothetical champion. Maybe, against all evidence and odds, these Taiwanese discount firms will answer the call for DDR and slay the big, bad, Intel dragon. Kind of funny how the one chip being rallied around now is the 845, DDR's last stand, but its expressed as if DDR has won final victory. Go figure, but you know the source. But the fact that someone had the gaul to say that SDRAM100 is "faster" memory than RDRAM...people, please, only in the most convuluted use of Clintonese logic could a statement like this even approach objective truth or even as a synapse in anyone's brain. As they say on the X-Files, the truth is out there. It is just difficult to find on this thread. Tinker P.S. It is not that I haven't gained valuable info on this thread in the past with selective posts. This thread use to be the place to go for this information and insight; maybe it can get back to that sort of thread again, where Bilow's posts are balanced against objective evidence and analysis. Or even Bilow is often ignored in lieu of reading posts that contain such objective information.