SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Pitera who wrote (19443)6/29/2001 5:05:16 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 30051
 
John, I think that VXN should always be some 50 to 100% greater than VIX, the former is premiums on NDX the later on SP100, much less volatile than the NDX individual stocks.

Zeev



To: John Pitera who wrote (19443)6/29/2001 7:27:11 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
The folks at CONTRARY INVESTOR place much more emphasis on VIX than most folks on this thread. True strong rallies can occur with low VIX. But A low VIX greatly reduces the odds of a strong rally IMHO and the high level of complacency signalled by such readings often leads to sharp declines. To me low VIX and VXN signal unfavorable risk/reward relationships in the markets. Nothing more nor less than that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News