To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (389 ) 6/29/2001 7:23:10 PM From: craig crawford Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1643 nice article, thank you very much. here's an interesting article as well. it should be noted that the author is the same bozo who in 1999 believed the dow was fairly valued at 36,000 right then, but accepted that it might take 5 years to get there. that means he predicted dow 36,000 by 2004. i suppose it's possible, but...well if it reached 36k we might need a wheelbarrow full of money to buy a loaf of bread ;-) to make matters worse he likes those worthless inflation adjusted treasury bonds! i feel much better about being bullish on commodities for the next decade now that i read this guy! this guy is some piece of work. he wrote an article saying stocks are not overvalued on march 30, 1998 right at the exact top in the broad markets! ................................................................................................................................ This article appeared in The Washington Post on September 12, 1999. Dow 36,000: The Case for a New Stock Market Modelaei.org We first made our views known on March 30, 1998, with the Dow Jones industrial average at 8782. The article was headlined, "Are Stocks Overvalued? Not a Chance." We say in the book that the Dow should be at 36,000 today, but that realistically the process should take about five years. That's a growth rate of roughly 25 percent annually, not so outlandish considering the record since 1982. And, of course, the Dow is up more than 20 percent this year already. Stay Away From Things; Invest in Brains June 26, 2001 foliofn.com Don't worry. Over the years, I have grown to loathe commodity stocks - especially gold and silver. There is not the slightest reason to own them. In the past, you might have bought such companies - or the metals themselves -- as a hedge against inflation, but the new Treasury Inflation-Protection bonds work much better, guaranteeing a real interest rate of 3 percent to 4 percent annually plus the increase in the Consumer Price Index. There is a simple reason to stay away from such stocks. When you buy them, you are betting on commodities - on things. When you buy shares in a more conventional software firm or retailer, on the other hand, you are betting on people - or, more precisely, on the human imagination, and that's the force that has powered the world economy for the past two centuries. Gold, silver and copper have been around forever, but it is only human capital, unleashed in a society that values competition and property rights, that creates true widespread wealth. ............................................................................................................................. Take this year for example. Commodity stocks have rallied for no good reason - except perhaps that they were so low. Gold itself has been stagnant, ending 1998 at $291 an ounce; 1999 at $284 an ounce; and 2000 at $271. Now it's a few bucks higher. Silver is actually down for the year, as are soybeans and coffee (to pick a couple of staples at random). The question that the precious-metals - and natural resources - investor must ask is this: Do you want to put your trust in things or brains? Things are fine in a period of rampant inflation or in an economy where brains aren't free to do their work because of excessive regulation, high taxes or cartels. Right now, at least, brains have things beat by a mile.