SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (156813)7/1/2001 12:24:11 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
FRIED CALAMARI 1 lb. cleaned squid -- including both tubes and tentacles
1 cup all-purpose wheat flour
Salt and pepper
Juice of 1 lemon
1/2 cup water
1/2 cup peanut oil, preferably of hearty flavor

Mix the flour, salt, and pepper and set the mixture aside. Place the cleaned squid in a bowl. Mix the water
with the lemon juice and pour it over the squid. Marinate about one hour, in the refrigerator. Lift the
squid pieces one at a time from the marinade and dredge in the flour mixture, thoroughly coating both
sides. Heat the peanut oil in a skillet over a medium-to-high flame and add the squid. Cook about ten
minutes, until you see a golden crust more than halfway up the sides of the squid. Turn the squid and fry it
until the other side is browned-about three minutes. Serve with lemon wedges, over hot rice or warm
pita bread. Enjoy.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: Neocon who wrote (156813)7/1/2001 4:23:05 AM
From: ColtonGang  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Glad to see you come back to your senses since you were quoted over at " extreme right wing" thread.



To: Neocon who wrote (156813)7/1/2001 4:28:55 AM
From: ColtonGang  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
What You Should Know About Calamari

Calamari is, of course, squid. It is cleaned by pulling off the head, thereby removing most of the uneatable innards, then rinse well. You then remove the outside skin. Both the body and tentacles are eatable. The flesh is firm and sweet and should never be “fishy”. The body can be stuffed or cut into rings before cooking. You must be aware that overcooking will result in a tasteless and rubbery meal.



To: Neocon who wrote (156813)7/1/2001 4:31:47 AM
From: ColtonGang  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Wonderful piece on Bush's weak poll showing..........Partisan Divisions Bedevil Bush
Advisers Seek Ways to Redefine Presidency as Popularity Slips





By Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, July 1, 2001; Page A01

President Bush has failed to ease the partisan divisions in the country during his first months in office, frustrating administration efforts to enlarge his fragile political base and prompting advisers to look for ways to redefine his presidency, according to polls, administration officials and party strategists.

Despite passage of the biggest tax cut in two decades and substantial progress on an education reform bill, Bush's approval ratings have declined over the past 60 days, and the electorate remains as sharply divided as it was at the end of last year's election.

The drop in public opinion, coupled with the fact that Democrats now control the Senate, has emboldened the president's Democratic opponents in Congress. And in recent days, many Republicans in the House have abandoned the administration on key votes involving energy and the environment, as lawmakers weigh their own political fortunes against loyalty to a president who is bucking public opinion on some critical issues.

Publicly, the president's advisers say the situation represents no cause for concern. Privately, they are said to be studying the polls carefully and looking for ways to sharpen Bush's image as a "compassionate conservative" in an effort to lure more independents to his coalition. White House officials anticipate a bipartisan signing ceremony this summer on the education bill nearing final approval in Congress, and they recently stepped up efforts to win support for his proposal to promote religious-oriented social service groups.

The administration also has begun planning for a fall offensive that one official said will be aimed at "carving out a different kind of orthodoxy for the party." The effort, led by senior adviser Karl Rove, is still in the formative stages, but administration officials hope to assemble a list of proposals that will showcase the president as more than an advocate of big tax cuts and a friend of corporate interests.

One official said Rove is working with White House policy advisers to pick issues to highlight. Possible candidates include cultural or values issues, particularly those related to parents, adoption initiatives, new mentoring programs and possibly additional education proposals.

In the longer term, Bush remains committed to an ambitious agenda that includes national missile defense and overhauling Medicare and Social Security. But his failure to break through the partisan polarization within the electorate and secure stronger support among political independents could weaken his hand in those battles.

Bush pulled off a political makeover last year after his bruising primary challenge from Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), aggressively moving to the center before the Republican National Convention. But Democrats and some independent analysts said that, given the first impressions he has made in office, the president faces a far more difficult challenge now than when he was a candidate in changing his image.

"The White House has been extremely deft at fixing short-term problems but refuses to confront their over-arching problem, which is that the president campaigned as a centrist and is governing as a conservative," said Bruce Reed, president of the Democratic Leadership Council and domestic policy chief in the Clinton administration. "They won't broaden their appeal until they do."

Bush's approval rating has declined over the past two months, according to polls released in recent weeks, with the latest NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll putting his approval at 50 percent, the lowest mark for a president in five years in that poll. Surveys by The Washington Post and ABC News; CBS News and the New York Times; and the Pew Research Center also have recorded declines in his approval rating during that period.

The polls also indicate that Bush's energy and environmental policies have put him on the wrong side of public opinion. Those surveyed say that Bush favors oil companies at the expense of the environment and that they want greater emphasis on environmental protection and energy conservation than they believe Bush favors. Several polls also found that Americans do not believe Bush understands their problems.

Bush advisers play down the recent round of polls. Virginia Gov. James S. Gilmore III, chairman of the Republican National Committee, staged a conference call with reporters on the day the latest NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll was released. "The president is popular; he remains popular. His policies are doing very, very well," Gilmore said.

Matthew Dowd, the RNC's director of polling, said that when viewed over a longer period of time, Bush's approval rating has remained relatively steady. He also argued that the sharply polarized electorate -- which he said predates Bush's presidency -- means that the president will rarely have approval ratings above 60 percent and that about one-third of the country will say they disapprove of how he is doing his job. "We're never going to be out of that box," he said.

Bush, like former president Bill Clinton, has proven to be a president who generates fierce support within his own party and strong opposition in the other party. But he campaigned on a pledge to "change the tone" in Washington after the partisan rancor of the Clinton years. Polls show Bush receives some credit from the public on that front, but it has not spilled over into other assessments of his presidency.

"We're five months into his presidency, and he hasn't won anybody over who wasn't with him at the beginning," Democratic pollster Geoff Garin said. "He had every opportunity in the world."

A Republican strategist agreed: "His situation is the same as Clinton's. There's a segment of the population that won't like him no matter what he does. We had hopes in the first 100 days that we might get some crossover, but that's not going to happen anymore."

Bush's image as a traditional conservative has been shaped by both success and failure. Administration officials count the tax bill as a major accomplishment. "If we hadn't gotten the tax bill, we'd be in really bad shape," an official said. But officials acknowledge that the time and effort that went into passing the bill forced Bush to talk much more about a conventionally Republican issue than about education, the issue he used most successfully in his campaign to demonstrate his independence from GOP doctrine.

Other Republicans are more critical of the administration's failure to highlight education more systematically. "In the campaign when he got too far to the right, he talked about education and went right back to the center. I would argue we're not trying very hard" now, a GOP strategist said.

At the same time, Bush has suffered from the administration's mistakes in the areas of energy and the environment. Some involve policy choices the administration has made in its energy package, and some come from failures to explain decisions about environmental regulations early in his term, administration officials said.

"The compassionate conservative agenda doesn't receive a lot of attention," said Dan Bartlett, deputy counselor to the president, citing Bush's proposal to fund religious-based social service organizations. "They have not received as much attention as the tax cut did or the regulatory entanglement. . . . And we probably didn't do as good a job in characterizing who this president was early on, particularly on the environment."

But some Republican strategists argued that far more is needed to undo some of the early damage. One strategist said the administration must make some decisions on energy and the environment that go directly against the interests of the oil industry. "The only way you really deal with it is you've got to look like you've offended somebody," this strategist said.

What troubles some Bush advisers is that the president's standing with the public may hinder his efforts to enact an ambitious agenda on defense and entitlement programs. One official argued that with the passage of the tax cut, near-passage of the education bill and the prospect for other legislative successes, Bush can still point to a record of accomplishment in his first year in office.

But one White House official said that would fall far short of Bush's goal: "His ambition was greater than that. It was to reposition the Republican Party as the party of hope and inclusion and progress for the poor."

Democratic pollster Peter Hart, who, along with Republican Robert Teeter, conducts the polling for NBC and the Wall Street Journal, said there is no simple explanation for Bush's standing, which he described as "mediocre and probably pretty disturbing" to Republicans and the White House.

Hart also questioned whether Bush is a commanding enough leader to pull off the kind of redefinition some Bush advisers are talking about. Arguing that Bush spends too much time poking fun at himself and is less visible than some recent past presidents, Hart said: "The bottom line in all this is that he's become a president where there's less than meets the eye rather than more than meets the eye."

Teeter offered a more positive view of Bush's current situation. "It's not that he's in great shape or in trouble," he said. But Teeter said the implications of public opinion are that stitching together a governing coalition in the current environment will not be easy. "We don't appear to have a unified governing coalition, and that makes it hard to govern," he said. "That's why he's down. If I were them, I wouldn't panic over that."

© 2001 The Washington Post Company



To: Neocon who wrote (156813)7/1/2001 4:39:21 AM
From: ColtonGang  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
More Bush critics.....A White House wake-up call
With Bush's poll numbers sliding, some GOP insiders fret that his low-key style is not playing with the public.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Jake Tapper

June 30, 2001 | WASHINGTON -- "Where is everybody?" asked White House press secretary Ari Fleischer at the beginning of Thursday's press briefing. He was talking about the number of reporters present, but he could have been talking about the number of supporters represented in the president's poll figures. Instead of climbing, they're sinking.

George W. Bush came to Washington promising to be the un-Clinton. He wouldn't get in people's faces, he wouldn't sully the Oval Office with tawdriness, he wouldn't feel our pain. He has succeeded.


Unfortunately for Bush, at least as of right now, there were two positive things Clinton had going for him that Bush does not: Americans believed that Clinton cared about them, and they thought he was up to the job. This was achieved not merely by policy efforts, but by a 24/7 running campaign that had the president speaking about every possible issue, driving the debate. And it manifested itself as support in the public opinion polls.

President Bush, conversely, has kept himself distant and remote, not merely from the cameras but from the legislative process. The strategy in many ways has been to create a relatively news-free environment. Bush has held fewer press conferences than either Clinton or his father at this point in their presidencies. White House reporters now regularly leave Pennsylvania Avenue to search for stories. Press charters have been canceled for presidential trips due to lack of interest among the press corps.

"His first instinct was to be the opposite of Clinton, which was probably wise," says William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard. "There was a giant sigh of relief that he wasn't in your face, that he didn't feel the need to step into every national issue. But that may now be wearing thin, at least in terms of driving the agenda."

"The A-4 president is getting A-4 attention from the public," says John Czwartacki, former spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., now a lobbyist. "He's not really considered a factor in people's lives right now." ("A-4" refers to Page A-4 in newspapers, where news about Bush has been showing up.)

Unfortunately for Bush, this has begun to show up in the polls. In Washington, the telltale sign that a politician's in trouble comes when the party boss arranges a conference call to argue that there's no trouble at all. On Thursday, Republican National Committee chairman Jim Gilmore did just that, which ended up feeding the fire.

A New York Times/CBS News poll released June 21 showed the president's popular support had dropped 7 points, to a 53 percent approval rating. While Bush's predecessor suffered similar numbers at this point in his first term, Clinton had suffered a few ignominious defeats at this point -- on gays in the military and a host of Nanny-gate scandals. Bush, conversely, has gotten almost all of his $1.35 trillion tax cut passed, in record time, and had just returned from a fairly successful trip to Europe. But Americans seemed to be losing faith in their president regardless.

Moreover, poll respondents had concerns about Bush on specific issues. Support for his handling of environmental issues had dropped to 39 percent of the public; his response to the energy crisis met with only 33 percent approval; and his foreign policy was supported by 47 percent of the public. Fifty percent of those polled thought Bush favored the rich.

Conservatives began immediately lashing out at the poll. "It's a slow news day when the top story in the New York Times is a presidential poll," wrote John J. Miller and Ramesh Ponnuru on Nationalreview.com, "especially a trumped-up one saying George W. Bush's popularity has 'diminished considerably' when in fact it's down only 7 points ... This is perhaps a cause for modest concern at the White House, but no more - surely nothing that warrants the screaming, APB-treatment of the Times." The New York Times' William Safire took a swipe at his paper in its own pages, claiming other polls showed no such drops.

But then came the other polls, which backed up the Times/CBS research. A Pew Research Center poll showed a 6-point dip in the president's approval ratings from April to June, down to 50 percent. A CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll had an 8-point dip in the last three months, to 55 percent. And an NBC-Wall Street Journal poll over the same time period showed a 7-point dip to approval ratings of 50 percent.