Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HairBall who wrote (35)	7/1/2001 1:33:07 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Respond to of 306849

Nice link, thanks LG. EDIT: It's pretty breathtaking how fast it rolls over once building finally slows...check out California 1983-84 and Arizona '89-'90

To: HairBall who wrote (35)	7/1/2001 4:50:33 PM
From: captaintime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

LG, I did a cursory study of recent mortgage rates trying to pin down a limit on the liquidity bullet AG has to put refinance money in the pocket of consumers. It appears that there was a limited high rate window through the summer of 2000; the sales in this period are prime for conventional refinances. Once this consumer segment is exhausted it will take a radical break in rates to 6% and below to make a new wave of refinancing and this AG bullet viable. This would suggest that any secular bear market in stocks could mean strength in treasuries and bonds if the economy falls into an extended recession

To: HairBall who wrote (35)	7/3/2001 9:29:29 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

LG,i am sitting on land that is NOT residential,but is land coveted by the very rich for their private usage.And as what is called "water front land" in these parts is getting scarce the pricing has escalated 2,000% percent over the last 25years. I am in no mood to sell for personal reasons(one beinng i live there,LOL!). But it is my feeling this type of land will remain price stable or even escalate more in bad times,because the very rich are always very rich--and they covet private hard to get 'postcard' hide-aways even more in dark-times.Is this a stupid conception???? Max