Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sergiotenenbaum who wrote (75228)	7/1/2001 4:48:10 PM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

High ST, P.S. I enjoy very much reading your posts. Their form is flawless, fun to read, and probably the best written on any board. Now, as for their content, you would allow a disagreement here and there, won’t you? Thanks ST but you'll understand if I take the opposite view on this. After all, I can't spelt for crap. My punctation weaks!! ... And I have never, in my wildest dreams, even considered an infinitive that couldn't be split also. ...Perhaps it would help if I knew what an infinitive is. <Hoo Hoo 8-> But my "content!!??!" Well, all I can say is that, ...except for the dreaded "Pin Count Theory vs INTC/RMBS Conspiracy Theory," each and every idea I have ever come up with has been "dead on the money!" ...Particularly my RMTR ideas. ...That has been VERY "dead on the money." <Hoo Hoo 8-> However, I stand on my rights as a Mom & Pop to have my own personal stock fetish whose symbol starts with "R!" <Ha Hoo 8-> 0\|0 P.S. Don't get hung up on the legal stuff I say. Scumbria may be wrong about "politics" determining the market results, that's all economics. But the "Law" is 98% political economy, i.e., "What rules can we impose that won't make them come shoot us?" <g> There is no other way to explain the "legalities" of moving between acceptance of things as diverse as slavery, separate but equal, Final Solutions, to protected classifications,... and likely back again if we wait long enough.<vbg> Thus my legal view in this situation is now and has always been informed by my personal perception that the only "friends" of RMBS are those who have future profits and losses at risk. Everyone else who knows them and cares enough to form an opinion seems to think they stink. I think the judiciary will get a whiff of the same aromas and act accordingly. And don't mistake the PTO response for that of "The Law." The PTO is the ultimate in bureaucracy by the Federales. The Prime Directive of these central authorities is to support the uniform and elephantine in all things corporate. ...Well, it worked in WWII didn't it? Judges are different. Although they too must bow to the Business of America, they also keep a finger in the wind to guard against Angry Villagers storming the walls. That is in fact their Prime Directive. Fortunately for us Busless Mom & Pops, MU, JEDEC and the industry folk cheering them on are very big Angry Villagers and INTC is no threat to stand guard at the wall. I trust the Judiciary to note these facts and apply their rules accordingly. ...Otherwise I might have to pick up a rock my ownselfs! <Hoo Hoo 8->