SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: H James Morris who wrote (127590)7/1/2001 8:38:26 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Respond to of 164684
 
Forrester research estimates that Forrester Research wants more $$$ for its partners' pockets.



To: H James Morris who wrote (127590)7/1/2001 9:28:21 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
well there's bound to be more market fireworks going foward!

news.ft.com



To: H James Morris who wrote (127590)7/2/2001 8:36:36 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
interactive.wsj.com

"Followers of the Motley Fool
Are Suffering, and Not Gladly

By IANTHE JEANNE DUGAN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- For some investors, Motley Fool(www.fool.com) has turned into something of a tragedy.

"Who was I kidding, thinking I could do this on my own?" scoffs Bruce Corigliano, a former "Fool" follower, marking a shift in the reverential tone that he and other small investors had when they gushed about the popular Web site during the bull market.

The 50-year-old Los Angeles doctor says that last year he lost 30% of his children's college fund by following a stock-buying strategy devised by David and Tom Gardner, brothers who sparked the do-it-yourself investment movement in 1994 with an electronic forum named after a Shakespearean character. Wearing jester hats and trumpeting the profits on their model portfolios, the then-twentysomething English majors demonstrated that stock picking was fun and easy.
"

It is worth reading the rest.



To: H James Morris who wrote (127590)7/2/2001 9:43:55 AM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
7:19AM NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) 92.75: Negative comments in latest edition of Barron's by short-seller David Tice. Views shares of graphic chip maker as over owned and overvalued, setting up stock for a fall.