SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Shread who wrote (10791)7/2/2001 7:40:16 AM
From: donald sew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
Paul,

>>>> Puetz crash cycle will be at its peak July 5-9. <<<<

From what I read, it appears that the probability is high IF there is a crash senerio that it would occur during this time-frame. I mention it since some and maybe many may interpret that the Puetz crash cycle predicts crashes, which is different.

The probability of predicting crashes is very low, and one of the most difficult types of predictions. It was mentioned that the Puetz cycle occurs once or twice a year. OK, so lets say that over the last 30 years the PUETZ CYCLE occured 45 times(1.5 x 30). How many strong selloffs which would qualify for a crash occurred in the last 30 years.

My point is not to take away from Puetz's crash cycle, but to explain the difference between predicting a crash and what the PUETZ crash cycle means - which is IF a crash occurs it has a high probability of occuring in this timeframe. They are 2 different environments.

If I had to guess the probability of calling a crash is maybe around 10%. Thats not to say no one will get it right for the next crash, but to correctly access probability, how well can one predict a crash based on a minimum of 30 crashes to be statistically viable - and that means if they was not able to predict a crash, that would one wrong call.

I mention it since it appears that some and even many attributes a high probability to someone who made ONE great call - thats NOT PROBABILITY - THATS EMOTION!.



To: Paul Shread who wrote (10791)7/6/2001 10:30:52 AM
From: Berney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
Paul, That was an excellent warning light that you started flashing.

Thanks for your efforts!

Berney