To: Eric L who wrote (13233 ) 7/2/2001 10:08:32 AM From: 49thMIMOMander Respond to of 34857 Building new or improving standards: Usually done so that someone first makes "their own thing" Slightly different if it is a major or a minor vendor. Usually "the others" are quick to do something similar, but if possible slightly different, more cost effective or better, improved. If it goes really bad it turns into a patent war, incompatible systems, some gain from this, some lose from that, more complex than chess. However, this is where the operators and ITU comes in, negotiations are done all the time, constructive and sometimes destructive., run be the future customers. One major rule is that when the new standard is specified, for it to be approved, all vendors should be fairly eqally placed "on the starting line", patents cross licensed, or other similar solutions found,etc.. One main point that nobody should have compatible, existing equipment for sale out in the field. However, these mechanisms are now changing, from upgrading eeprom to flashing them or even remote flashing, both for fixed operator equipment and user equipment. Compare the 56kflex, etc years leading up to V90. (in that case Rockwell, Motorola, 3COM,etc couldn't agree on V90 in time, so 2-3 years were lost, small companies went belly up, sales down for 2 years because of "waiting for V90", even with marketing "upgradable modems", some scams,etc) That is, one need to know a lot of the "behind the scene" factors to have an opinion on smart messaging-EMS-MMS. The fact that MMS is happily agreed on tells me everything is OK, and downloadable ringtones, logos,etc got started and progress is fast. Ilmarinen P.S. Those who might be unhappy are those who were hoping for a some "easy money", sat on a "submarine patent", contract on future royalties,etc, others are fast to adopt the new standard by participating in developing it. (I know nothing about this for messaging,etc this case)