Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Duke of URL© who wrote (59315)	7/2/2001 12:19:08 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

>> In response and in rebuttal to your argument, which contains not one wit of legal reasoning, let me just uncategorically state: Yo Mama!!!!! <<LOL>>! That's as good as any argument any I've heard <gg>. Lay people debating the legal merits of the appeals court's ruling wouldn't seem to be very productive. There are already legions of highly trained over paid lawyers doing that non-productively, and coming to contradictory conclusions. It seems the courts have once again rendered an opinion that is as clear as mud, and the only certainty is that Mr. Softee will have many more years of litigation in its future. But it appears that their day to day behavior will be less constrained by the judicial system, so the important issue to assess is, will they be able to begin growing their businesses again? uf