To: Dr.MensaWannabe who wrote (601 ) 7/2/2001 3:59:27 PM From: CountofMoneyCristo Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3143 You, without stating who you are or for whom you may or not be working, have asked me a great many questions here. Many of them are loaded questions. Nevertheless, I have published my name here, and I have answered all questions that fall outside of the matter of my relationship with Counsel. I am not prepared to discuss that here. That is a matter that does not concern you. Now why have I answered so many questions? I am not under any obligation to do so. I am furthermore aware that those who shall be named as defendants shall think to use these words against me. I am unafraid of this; therefore, I have spoken here. You, on the other hand, have not answered any of my questions. You state that first everyone else should answer them? I do not agree. Through your statements and actions here you have given ample reason for me to ask them. Now I do it yet again. If you continue to refuse to provide answers to these fair and reasonable questions, then in fact we may have our answer anyway...1. Are you working on behalf of brokerage firms or chat sites, or a law firm representing brokers/sites, or anyone affiliated with such? 2. Are you currently employed by a brokerage firm or chat site or an affiliate of these? 3. Are you attempting to mislead SI Members about this case and about myself personally? 4. Have you ever met me? 5. Have you ever used multiple aliases simultaneously on SI? 6. Have you ever attempted to secure Counsel for this case at any time? 7. Why did you imply that I might become a defendant in this case? Do you have evidence of any wrongdoing on my part? (If not you commit libel.) 8. Are you, among others, the SI member known as "leeza ze viphre," posting under yet another alias?