SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: NightOwl who wrote (75321)7/3/2001 9:50:06 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Owl,

I'm only interested in the facts.

1. I was interested in RDRAM as a solution to graphics and networking bandwidth limitations.

2. I was interested in the fact that RDRAM would do nothing for PIII performance.

3. I was interested in the SDRAM IP issues, which appeared to be questionable to me as an engineer.

4. I was interested in how CPUs would handle bandwidth requirements above 2GHz.

The fact is that Intel has arrived at 2GHz first, and they have only provided one real solution for P4- which is RDRAM. Given that P4 is Intel's flagship processor, that tells me that RDRAM has a strong future. I don't see how it could be interpreted any other way.

Scumbria