SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maui_dude who wrote (138589)7/3/2001 12:39:56 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Maui, McKinley is a very different design from Merced. As the years went by, Intel and HP realized that what they'd architected in the mid 90s wasn't going to be good enough for the 2000s. Other microprocessor designs had improved so much as to put it to shame. So, they started over. Well, I'm sure there are recognizable pieces in Mac from Merced.

Sounds like you're thinking they had to rob from Peter to pay Paul. I think they probably used some PaRISC, some Merced, some who knows what else. Gotta get to Mac.

Tony



To: maui_dude who wrote (138589)7/3/2001 1:11:48 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 186894
 
Maui, <But if you want a much larger cache and a much better specInt, you have to give up other aspects (even accounting for a better McKinley microarchitecture).>

Prepare to be pleasantly surprised next year ...

Tenchusatsu



To: maui_dude who wrote (138589)7/3/2001 11:38:27 PM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hi Maui Dude, You're right. It's not a step backward if a hypothetical tradeoff occurs where one feature is significantly improved, while the other feature is held constant.

And if the other feature improves, so much the better.

Regards,
Amy J