Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (101136)	7/3/2001 12:37:30 PM
From: Ibexx	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Could you please elaborate your comment just a bit. Thanks in advance, Ibexx

To: JGoren who wrote (101136)	7/3/2001 12:42:06 PM
From: Kayaker	Respond to of 152472

sounds to me as if there is no royalty for infra Under the terms of the multi-million dollar expansion, Nokia has also been granted a royalty-bearing license under QUALCOMM’s patents to make and sell infrastructure equipment for all CDMA wireless systems.... qualcomm.com Pardon if you were referring to something else.

To: JGoren who wrote (101136)	7/3/2001 12:42:12 PM
From: gdichaz	Respond to of 152472

JGoren: Given your skill as a lawyer and your correct calls on NextWave, I respect your view. But, nothing would surprise me more. Everything in the history of Qualcomm would indicate that Nokia will pay exactly the same royalties for infrastructure that any other licensee pays. The only "break" (if there is one) is keeping whatever royalty Nokia has paid for handsets (now more broadly - subscriber terminals) as the original 1992 agreement. And it is unclear what that is. Best. Chaz