Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BinkY2K who wrote (8040)	7/3/2001 6:32:47 PM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

I repeat my assertion. Lumping REFR with things you consider frauds is a meaningless smear. Please go visit the exhibits in Times Square where I have heard from people that the stuff works and is magical and they want to BUY these products. Very reveraling. Is that what you call "DD".? "I have heard from people (who?) that it works (how?) and is magical (I must believe so). " But... is "it" reliable? What does it cost for buying it and maintaining it? Can it be produced in larger quantities? Is it economically viable? Prospective customers? Is there competition ("must be", if it is a viable product), which companies? Why is there no competition? Are other well established companies so much dumber that they let forego such an opportunity? When Bill states that: "Many of the followers of cult stocks are scientifically illiterate." I have to agree when I read through the cans and mays and bees you are dispersing about refr. I'd rather call it quackery, if it comes to Zinc, but I'm lacking the words right here.