Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CaptainSEC who wrote (72413)	7/3/2001 11:14:43 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

I'm not the judge here I was just posting my opinion of the possible interpretation of the rules of the contest. Don't listen to me. I just post here.

To: CaptainSEC who wrote (72413)	7/4/2001 6:06:35 AM
From: pilapir	Respond to of 122087

CaptainSEC! You look like a WINNER to me! Think you made your case ,, Hard to refute! .. revised or otherwise! Congrats $$$$ ;-)

To: CaptainSEC who wrote (72413)	7/4/2001 7:33:40 AM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

CaptainSEC, for me, one question remains: Has "the report" ( the Sulph report from AP) a disclaimer included? I have read through many reports issued by domestic investment banks or advisers and they all contain a pagelong disclaimer. In most cases the disclaimers state that the reports are being produced on a "best efforts basis" but "may" contain (slight) inaccuracies [without giving any guidance as to what "slight" means], which are [of course] never intentional and as a result, can never give rise to any claims for damages...

To: CaptainSEC who wrote (72413)	7/4/2001 12:39:41 PM
From: rjm2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

CaptainSEC I think the guy owes you some $$ ! Feel free to bash me AP followers. While, I like exposing a good scam as much as anyone, the cult-like attitude here is scary. AP can do no wrong, EVEN THOUGH he did, over & over & over in the past. Dont drink the kool-aid folks !

To: CaptainSEC who wrote (72413)	7/4/2001 5:57:33 PM
From: Henk Wondergem	Respond to of 122087

Hi Captain! You sure have a different style than Tony! I do feel that for the uninitiated, Tony's style of spelling it out, is far more effective. But YOU being LONG with so much knowledge about this stock, I have not believed for a long time. ragingbull.lycos.com That these shares could be restricted, I do not consider very believable either. At least Tony states that he is short in an honest and upfront way that everyone understands. Why don't you propose to Tony to have a free membership to his private site for a month as payment of your impressive efforts and DD contributions of SLPH. Reading his postings, he sometimes can use a proof-reader. Both of you have dug up so much DD that smells, I am totally satisfied with the POS status of SLPH is well deserved. (But it is nice to see your confirmations) At the end DD will determine the value of the stock, Tony's approach shows that he's got to little of what you have too much ... PATIENCE. But the long term value of this stock is <$0.10 Don't you agree? Henk PS "I thought so"