Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CaptainSEC who wrote (72416)	7/4/2001 12:07:14 AM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Jesus, you guys are picky! I will never ever ask anyone here what they think about how I look or anything. You guys would pick me apart and make me cry :-( Next time I do a scam report I will go over it with a fine tooth comb for days and add a lot of caveats "as per Bloomberg data base July 3 at 6:01:02 a.m. PST, the number of outstanding shares were ..." "This information may contain errors."

To: CaptainSEC who wrote (72416)	7/4/2001 12:20:08 AM
From: Torus	Respond to of 122087

Anthony, I'm pretty sure I can help you weasel out of this one... The Merriam-Webster's dictionary says that "UNTRUTHFUL stresses a discrepancy between what is said and fact or reality." So on the surface it appears that all of the responses to your challenge by CaptainSEC meet the definition of UNTRUTHFUL...but wait!!!! It says "discrepancy between what is SAID and fact"...and you didn't actually SAY anything in your report, you WROTE these things in your report. Yeah...that's the ticket. And if that doesn't work you could give him the ol' "reality is subjective" argument. That one seems pretty "bulletproof". Or I suppose you could just pay him...