SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: calgal who wrote (157833)7/5/2001 12:50:01 PM
From: calgal  Respond to of 769670
 
Repeal Motor Voter!

David Limbaugh

jewishworldreview.com -- THE selective indignation of many of those clamoring about alleged minority voter disenfranchisement in Florida reveals that their primary concern is not to restore integrity to the election process, but to win political points and elections.

Without question, the recently released election report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights finding rampant discrimination against minority voters in Florida was agenda- rather than fact-driven. The commission's partisanship was so flagrant that the two Republican-appointed commission members were not permitted to see the report before it was issued to the media. The majority cavalierly dismissed their objections to the report's findings.

Accordingly, the minority members, Russell Redenbaugh and Abigail Thernstrom, filed a devastating rebuttal detailing the slanted nature of the commission's report. National Review Online's John Miller and Ramesh Ponnuru report on further developments in this ongoing saga. The commission – in many instances – did nothing to verify the truthfulness of certain allegations of voter disenfranchisement.

One witness relied on by the commission complained that she was prevented from voting because county election officials wrongly told her that she wasn't registered. In fact, she had completed a form in 1998 wherein she stated that she had moved from the county, and she never bothered to reregister upon moving back. Another witness charged that he was not informed that the location of the polling place had changed between the primary and the general elections so he didn't know where to vote in the general. A letter from the county elections supervisor, however, indicates that the same building was used for both elections.

If this commission and certain politicians were truly interested in the facts, wouldn't they take care to verify these allegations? If they were genuinely committed to ensuring that all eligible voters were permitted to vote (and ineligible ones excluded), wouldn't they also be concerned about rampant voter fraud? Wouldn't they be demanding that we get to the bottom of the thousands of felons casting votes illegally in last year's election? Wouldn't they be outraged at the systematic effort to deny military personnel their right to vote? Wouldn't they be mortified at the prospect of Internet voting because of the robust election fraud it is sure to generate? Wouldn't they be horrified at the laxity in voter registration brought on by the Motor Voter Law?

This law, officially known as the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, was enacted for the ostensible purpose of increasing voter turnout by making registration simpler. It requires states to establish voter registration procedures for federal elections so that citizens may register to vote by mail, at state and local public assistance agencies and while applying for a driver's license. As with so many other so-called reform measures, support for the bill quickly became part of the dogma of political correctness. Anyone opposed to it was painted as discriminatory, just as opponents of campaign finance "reform" are being accused of enabling government corruption.

Many contend that the law has greatly increased voter fraud by making it difficult for state election officials to remove from the rolls dead or inactive voters and by failing to require registrants to provide proof that they are citizens who are eligible to vote. This is a dangerous combination because it allows people to vote in the names of dead people, without ever having to produce a picture ID. Some estimate that between two and four percent of the votes cast in the 2000 presidential election were by non-citizens.

The Heritage Foundation's Todd Gaziano, in testimony regarding election reform before the House Committee on Rules and Administration, affirmed that Motor Voter "has helped create the most inaccurate voting rolls in history. Citizens are registered in multiple jurisdictions at the same time, and very few states have effective procedures to ensure that those registered even are citizens."

Congressman Bob Stump, R-Ariz., has proposed a bill (HR 189) to repeal the Motor Voter Law. A national grass-roots organization, "Americans For Repeal of the Motor Voter Law (AFRMVL)," has been formed to support Stump's bill.

Sometimes it takes courage for public officials to challenge the nostrums of political correctness. Motor Voter may sound noble to some, but it could be inflicting immeasurable damage on the republic. Those interested in real election reform, as opposed to rigging the rules to stack the deck in favor of their candidates, should take a hard look at Congressman Stump's bill.



To: calgal who wrote (157833)7/5/2001 1:41:05 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Burn, baby, burn
Tax rebate and cut, Fed easing could ignite economy

By Marshall Loeb, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 1:00 AM ET July 5, 2001




NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- What will happen to the economy now? Watch for a hot summer.

During August and September, the economy will feel the greatest concentration of fiscal and monetary stimulus in memory. Says Jon Lonski, chief economist at Moody's Investors Services: "It's not too often that both of these remedies are applied to the U.S. economy."

While growth may remain temporarily sluggish, three major forces will serve to lift the economy over the long term:

* Tax rebate checks will hit mailboxes. The mailing begins July 23 and will run through September 30. Virtually every person who files federal income taxes will get a check: Up to $300 for singles, $500 for heads of household, and $600 for married people filing jointly.

* Tax rates will be cut. All rates went down 1 percentage point as of July 1. It will take a while for corporate payroll departments to feed the new rates into their computers, so many employees won't see their cuts show up in their paychecks until August. Because half of this year is already behind us, the actual decline in our payroll withholding for the rest of this year will be one-half of one percentage point. The savings for any individual will be modest, but multiplied by all the scores of millions of taxpayers, it provide some stimulus for the economy.

Here are examples of rebates calculated by Weikart Tax Associates of New York City:

Jean and Jim earn a joint taxable income of $100,000. Between now and this year's end, their taxes will decline by $112, and their take-home pay will increase by $19 a month. Next year, their total tax reduction will be $224.
Tom and Theresa have a joint taxable income of $50,000. Their tax savings between now and this year's end will be $42, and their take-home pay will go up by $7 a month. Next year, their total tax reduction will be $84.
Mary is a single taxpayer with a taxable income of $20,000. She'll save about $16 this year, and take home about $3 a month more. Next year her total savings will be about $32.
* Pocketbook effects of the Fed's aggressive money-easing will take hold-and spread.

The Fed's six reductions since January have knocked the key federal funds rate down to its lowest level -- 3.75 percent -- since 1994. At the same time, the money supply, the so-called M2, is growing at its fastest rate -- 11 percent -- since 1983-84.

The rate cuts and the expansion in the money supply take time to filter through the economy. Some of the rate reductions are felt immediately, notably the prime rate charged to top borrowers for business investment, and the rates on automobile and home-equity loans. Rates on some other loans take up to six or twelve months to be felt, but they will grow in force during the summer and later on. Says Moody's Lonski: "We have the financial fuel to fund a rejuvenation of the economy."

Largely because interest rates have gone down so much, Lonski points out, consumers' applications to refinance their mortgages have jumped fivefold this year. One result: The savings in their mortgage rates will give Americans still more money to spend.

"By the end of the summer, the increase in household cash flow because of mortgage refinancing will lift consumer spending," Lonski says.

"August will be a turning point," adds Lynn Reasor, chief economist of Bank of America. "Lower gasoline prices will encourage Americans to take longer vacation trips. Retailers will heavily market their back-to-school sales. And people will very quickly spend their tax rebate checks."

Another little-recognized factor: Affluent people will see their Social Security payroll taxes temporarily decline, and their disposable income rise. Here's the reason:

The tax is 6.65% on the first $80,400 in wages-or a maximum $5,347 a year. If you earn, say, $100,000. Your payroll withholding will be $554 a month, and you will reach your annual maximum tax around the middle of October. For roughly the remaining ten weeks of the year, you will be hit with no further Social Security payroll deductions, and you will gain the equivalent of a $554 a-month tax cut-most of which you probably will spend, further stimulating the economy.

It's the combination of all those forces that lead David Jones, chief economist of Aubrey Lanston & Co., a world-wide investment bank, to forecast: "We've probably seen the worst of the economic slowdown. This year's third quarter will be last of four straight slow-growth quarters-at an annual rate of one to one and one-half percent. After that, we'll have a gradual but uneven recovery, though we may not get back to our speed limit of between three and one-half and four percent growth until the second half of next year."

Marshall Loeb, former editor of Fortune, Money, and The Columbia Journalism Review, writes "Your Dollars" exclusively for CBS.MarketWatch.com

cbs.marketwatch.com