SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gopher Broke who wrote (46123)7/5/2001 1:41:16 PM
From: fyodor_Respond to of 275872
 
Gopher, re: Nitrogen cooled processors&#133

On the face of it, the numbers look very good (1.8GHz for Tualatin, 2.8GHz for P4), but as has been said many times before on this thread, nitrogen-cooling doesn't really reflect how a chip will scale.

Still, I wouldn't mind a dual 1.8GHz Tualatin server in my basement ;-)

(I wouldn't want it in the living room or study, though)

-fyo



To: Gopher Broke who wrote (46123)7/5/2001 1:58:48 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: P4s hit 2800MHz liquid nitrogen cooled, Tualatin 1825MHz

The P4 reporting 2.8GHZ ran the bench he uses in 1 minute 7 seconds - about the same as and AthlonMP at 1.45GHZ. It may have been clock throttling, since a P4 at 2.4GHZ completed the benchmark in 1 minute 3 seconds.

AthlonMP at 1.6GHZ completed the benchmarks in 56 seconds.

On Bunny's website (may be a different version of the benchmark) the fastest listings are for an Athon at 2.3GHZ running SuperPi in 55 seconds tied with an AthlonMP at 1.8GHZ. Fastest P4 needs 1 minute 7 seconds and is running at 2.6GHZ.

Another interesting result is:
Running Tualatin, Athlon, and AthlonMP all at 1.13GHZ and all at 133FSB * 8.5 (times in seconds)
Tualatin=1'43" Athlon=1'42" AthlonMP=1'29"



To: Gopher Broke who wrote (46123)7/5/2001 2:15:31 PM
From: niceguy767Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Gopher Broke:

"What on earth is going on? No wonder Intel have called a meeting with customers to explain it all."

Confusion at INTC reigns, it seems!