SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: postyle who wrote (4693)7/5/2001 2:33:05 PM
From: John Hayman  Respond to of 5195
 
p.s. Yes, I would buy more QCOM if you can. {ggg}

I could, but own toooooo much now!!!!

Some other folks I know really well had tooooo much of IDCC! But, as we all know, win some lose some. gstrf....gulp!
John



To: postyle who wrote (4693)7/6/2001 3:40:15 PM
From: Bux  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5195
 
I feel like these comments are aimed partially at me.

You know, it is just as easy to find the old posts where many are claiming IDCC to be a "pump & dump" and a company with no viable CDMA patents.

Of course, after Matsushita forked over $19 million in upfront licensing fees to IDCC this year and Infineon signed a 10 year UMTS chip deal, those comments were obviously further off the mark than most.

And I don't see many publicly admitting they were wrong.


Postyle, I do admit my mistakes quite readily but the fact of the matter is, the Matsushita and Infineon deals do not conflict with any views I have presented. If you feel otherwise, I invite you to post my comments here.

I prefer not to have any skeletons and always try to remain objective in order to maximize the value of my research.

Bux