SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (48732)7/5/2001 2:44:58 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Richard and all, how about "price by volume"? Here's the definition stockcharts.com

and the weekly chart stockcharts.com[w,a]waclyimy[pb30!i][vc60][iUb14!Uj[$sox]!La12,26,9!Lf]
monthly
stockcharts.com[w,a]maclyimy[pb30!i][vc60][iUb14!Uj[$sox]!La12,26,9!Lf]

Looks like the vast majority of shares was bought under $60.
This means that once price goes above $60 almost everyone has a profit and there will not be much selling pressure.

The same cannot be said for this stock stockcharts.com[w,a]waclyimy[pb30!i][vc60][iUb14!Uj[$sox]!La12,26,9!Lf]

Gottfried



To: Math Junkie who wrote (48732)7/5/2001 3:40:24 PM
From: StanX Long  Respond to of 70976
 
Being someone who is on a "forced vacation". It make since to me as Katherine pointed out, the buildings are idle too.

All this required was coordinating everyone’s vacation at one time. Where if we took vacation at different times, the accounting for the vacations would be the same, but the facilities would be fully "up and running".

I would gladly take vacations at the same time rather than seeing someone "myself" layed-off.

Stan


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News