Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scoobypax who wrote (72456)	7/5/2001 3:37:07 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Not that I know of ;-) "Are you SURE you're not his ex-wife or a former lover?" Let's get this clear. I was just throwing out my opinion of what the rules meant to me. I don't speak for tony. I don't work with tony. I'm not a member of his club. We've never even met. I don't short stocks. I just think that he was looking for someone to show that he intentionally lied about something that would affect the overall impression of his report. Differences in sources and tiny numbers don't affect the bottom line of the report, i.e. slph looks scammy. Plus, sources really vary a lot. Right now on yahoo astn we're in a debate about past insider sales. Seems we've used four different sources and they're all different. We're trying to figure out exactly what insider trades the ceo fred rittereiser and his holding company dover had. Selling a few dollars worth after the peak and buying back a few pennies worth at the bottom does not spell insider confidence to me. Still need to find out the exact number.