SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (157995)7/5/2001 5:57:24 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Well, you certainly did better than Cy, and what do you know, the sole (second-hand) source is newsmax after all! (The Washington Times link was outdated, and there no link to the Fox report)

BTW, what is up with the obsession you folks have with my butt and its functions?



To: Ish who wrote (157995)7/5/2001 6:35:48 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Interesting. I have seen a lot of references to the problem that these liberals want to hide from, but not that one.

There is nothing not-obvious about any of this. These people tried to steal an election consisting of over 100 million votes. You can't be subtle when you do that, and it points to why the Electoral College is as good an idea today as when it was new: Such a large scale fraud would necessarily have to take place in large urban areas, where the human flotsam can be scraped out of the gutters and made to vote again and again and again. The influence of the small states must be given enough weight to protect them against
the possibility of this urban tyranny, which they can't otherwise counter.

As long as we subscribe to the myth that maximized "participation" makes for good elective government, we will need protection against political machines that take over urban areas like some kind of Red Guard and manufacture votes to order for whomever offers them the best possibility of graft...



To: Ish who wrote (157995)7/6/2001 4:44:16 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
"voter turnout in some precincts of Philadelphia was 100 percent."

That's not what CK said, he said 100% of Philly not some of Philly's precincts.....it is not terribly unusual to have 100% of voters turn out in some precincts all over for all kinds of votes including school board and school budget elections.... So Cyberken is really HyperbolicKen....